|
This review has been accessed times since December 18, 2001
Power, Thomas J., Karustis, James L., & Habboushe, Dina F.
(2001). Homework Success for Children with ADHD: A Family-School
Intervention Program. New York: The Guilford Press.
Pp. xviii +232.
$30 ISBN 1-57230-616-5 (Paper)
Kathleen Rutowski
Arizona State University
December 18, 2001
There is no doubt that homework can be a family struggle,
especially for children who are already struggling in school.
Dudley-Marling (2000) provides vivid and moving descriptions of
family interactions surrounding the completion of homework, the
impact a child's struggle in school has on that child’s life at
home, and the relationships between parents and school people.
Homework Success is manual describing a program aimed at reducing
the stress accompanying homework for young children with ADHD
while increasing their efficiency and the accuracy of the
homework they complete. It was developed by school psychologists
Thomas Power, Ph.D., James Karustis, Ph.D., and Post-Doctoral
Fellow Dina Habboushe, at the Children’s Hospital of
Philadelphia.
Homework for young children is a typical feature of schooling in
the United States. Power, Karustis, and Habboushe define
homework as "assignments given by teachers that are to be
performed by students outside of school or during
noninstructional classroom time" (p. 4). Arguments in favor
of homework stress the opportunity for children to establish
study skills and work habits essential for success in later
grades, opportunities to practice skills, and opportunities for
parents to become familiar with the work their children are doing
in school. Power, Karustis and Habboushe offer Homework
Success as a means to ameliorate the inevitable family stress
caused by homework. "In this program it is our intention to
offer hope, using approaches that have been empirically
validated, for children and families coping with ADHD" (p. 3).
To accomplish this end Homework Success describes a 7-week
program of clinically facilitated group sessions designed to
improve parent-child relationships and decrease parental stress
by helping parents to: 1) develop a deeper understanding of ADHD;
2) begin to use behavior modification strategies with their
children; and 3) establish collaborative relationships with the
teachers of their children.
Power, Karustis, and Habboushe posit that children with ADHD
display two important characteristics in school: 1) they are less
actively engaged in academic instruction; and 2) they require
more instruction and practice than their classmates. They
suggest that homework provides opportunities for children to
develop a useful learning strategy by helping them to take
advantage of opportunities to practice academic skills through
the completion of their assigned homework. It is ironic that
students who struggle in school are likely to have more homework
than their peers because their lack of attentiveness at school
leads to their failure to complete assignments and that these
same characteristics (distractability, lack of organization, poor
reading skills) will contribute to difficulties completing
homework at home. My own experience working with my son echoes
the oft hear parental lament that it takes two hours of
struggling with their child to get through 15 minutes of work.
The program outlined in Homework Success features clinical
support for parents, children, and teachers to help them acquire
specific strategies each can invoke to enable children with ADHD
to get through homework assignments with reduced stress while
increasing the child’s accuracy and efficiency of homework
completion.
Seven group sessions introduce parents to strategies aimed at
increasing their child’s organizational skills, reducing the
potential distractions in the homework environment, controlling
amount of time spent on homework, and providing the child
incentives to increase their productivity and the accuracy of
their homework. These group sessions also provide opportunities
for parents/caregivers to "take comfort in the stories of other
parents" (Dudley-Marling, 2000, p. 154) as they share their
experiences working with their children on homework issues. The
authors also provide guidelines for structuring group sessions
for children participating in Homework Success and suggest using
a token reinforcement system as a behavior management tool. The
children engage in two activities relating to the material
presented during their parents’ session and are reinforced during
15-minute intervals for appropriate behavior. The token economy
used with the children and the interventions taught to their
parents are based on a behavioral model and were culled from the
research literature because of their demonstrated effectiveness
in shaping the behaviors of children who have been diagnosed with
ADHD.
Two important features and strengths of the Homework Success
Program are: 1) the inclusion of comprehensive practical
guidelines for the clinician implementing the program; and 2) the
clinical support provided to participating parents/caregivers and
teachers as they begin to establish collaborative relationships.
Homework Success includes tools clinicians can use to screen for
parent/caregivers who are likely to benefit from a behavioral
approach to dealing with homework problems; suggestions on how to
begin to foster collaborative home-school relationships; detailed
descriptions of how to plan for and conduct the seven structured
group sessions involving parents (Chapters 7-13) and concurrent
sessions involving their children (Chapter 14); instruments and
instructions on how to measure the outcomes of the program
(Appendix B); and support materials to be used before and during
the groups sessions (Appendices A, C-E).
The second strength of Homework Success is the clinical support
it provides to parents and teachers as they work develop a
collaborative relationship that has as its initial focus the
resolution of homework difficulties. Program interventions are
embedded in a collaborative framework that involves parents,
teachers, and children in the setting of goals, collecting work
samples, development of rewards, and determination of homework
success. "The Homework Success Program is grounded in a
multisystemic, ecological approach that recognizes the importance
of the interconnectedness among systems in a child’s life. All
key players have a role in the program: parents, teachers,
medical professionals, and psychologists" (p. xi). This has the
potential of opening lines of communication between parents and
teachers that are necessary to cultivate the types of
collaborative efforts that are responsive to the needs of
individual families, their children, and their teachers.
"Meeting the challenges of students who struggle in school
depends, I believe, on the collaborative efforts of parents and
teachers, but the ability to develop these collaborative
relationships depends on the development of trust (Edwards,
1999). Trust, in turn will develop only when parents feel that
they and their children are being treated with respect. And a key
to showing respect is beginning with the assumption that all
parents care deeply about their children and their children’s
education" (Dudley-Marling, 2000, p. 152-153).
Homework Success provides clinical support to both teachers and
parents/caregivers as they work to develop trusting collaborative
relationships and as such may provide schools a valuable tool to
support their emerging collaborative skills. Parental/caretaker
participation in the Homework Success program communicates to
teachers the deep care and concern parents/caretakers have for
their children. This has the potential of fostering a trusting,
respectful collaborative relationship between parents/caregivers
and teachers. The teachers participating in Homework Success also
have clinical support as they work to develop their own
collaborative skills. Teaching has become a collaborative
profession as students with diverse needs have been included in
heterogeneous classrooms and the inability to establish
collaborative relationships between colleagues and parents is
commonly cited by districts as a reason for not renewing teacher
contracts (Pugach & Johnson, 2002).
Homework Success has the potential to provide a framework within
which parents/caregivers and teachers can begin to engage in
dialogue that has as its initial focus the resolution of homework
issues. Dudley-Marling (2000) states that "...the only way to
develop appropriate homework policies that are sensitive to the
needs of individual families is by talking candidly with parents
about homeworkspecifically, how teachers and parents can work
together to support children’s schoolwork without seriously
upsetting family relationships" (p.154). I would suggest that
it is this process of establishing collaborative relationships
among parents/caregivers and teachers that has the potential to
have the most profound impact on all the participantsteachers,
parents/caregivers, and children. Homework completion and
accuracy is a concrete issue that can galvanize parents and
teachers to begin the conversations necessary to establish
collaborative relationships critical to supporting children with
ADHD in educational systems and Homework Success provides a
comprehensive blueprint for use in schools.
There are, however, several complex issues that participants in
Homework Success may find it difficult to resolve. An essential
element of the program is that the teacher and parents establish
a maximum amount of time to be spent on homework. This requires
that the teacher develop and describe a strategy for evaluating
work that has not been completed or is not accurate. During the
initial parent-teacher meeting parents learn from the teacher
about the types of homework assigned, how much time should be
spent on homework, and how the homework is evaluated. The
teacher learns about homework problems as parents describe the
child’s approach to homework, how long homework takes, and the
impact homework is having on the family. The clinician asks the
teacher and parents to determine an absolute time limit for
homework and then asks teacher to develop a strategy to evaluate
homework that may not be complete or accurate. The clinician
periodically contacts the teacher to gather data on the progress
of the child in order to assess the outcomes of the program. At
the same time the child’s parents/caregivers are encouraged to
continue to communicate with their child’s teacher in order to
effectively implement the strategies they are developing to
increase the rate of completion and quality of the homework
produced by their child. There is the risk that some parents and
teachers might resist establishing a maximum amount of time to be
spent on homework if they suspect that the child is not being
held to the academic standards that other children meet and that
this may effect their long-term academic success in school. In
addition, homework policies must be sensitive to the ability of
parents to support their children’s homework. Homework Success
stipulates that parents may pre-teach their child before the
evenings homework time segment begins. This puts the parent in
the role of "teacher" and casts them as a mind-reader as they
try to determine what teaching strategies they should use and how
those strategies may complement or conflict with the strategies
used by their child’s teacher earlier in the day. Parents are
also put in the position of having to draw a fine line between
helping child understand problem and doing the assignment for
their child. At the same time teachers may have conflicting
notions about what constitutes a parent helping a student
complete a homework assignment and what constitute a parent doing
a child’s homework. In addition, parents have different views of
homework - intrusion on quality family time, a way to keep
children occupied, a constant source of stress and conflict, a
measure of the academic focus of their child’s school
(Dudley-Marling, 2000).
It is interesting that while Power, Karustis, and Habboushe
acknowledge that homework exacerbates stress in families with
children who have ADHD, they do not challenge the efficacy of
assigning homework for young children. The authors of Homework
Success wrestle briefly with this issue in the initial two
chapters of the book.
Although the direct effects of homework on academic
performance appear relatively modest in the elementary
years, there are additional benefits to assigning homework
to young students. Homework may help to develop study
skills and work habits, which can be useful to students in
the classroom and during homework when they get older.
Also, homework provides frequent opportunities for home-school
collaboration and parental involvement in school
which have been shown to be strongly related to student
outcomes. (p. 5)
They acknowledge that the empirical basis for claiming a positive
impact of homework on the academic performance younger children
is debatable but do not challenge the assumption that an
improvement in a young child’s rate of homework completion and
accuracy will lead to an improvement in that child’s academic
achievement. The data collected on a small sample of children
participating in a clinical trial of Homework Success and
reported in Chapter 15 of the manual indicates families
experienced a reduction in the level of family stress, but
demonstrates little improvement in the academic performance of
the children participating in the program.
The sustainability of the Homework Success interventions may
ultimately rest on the ability of the clinician to deliberately
address the connections or lack of connections between the
culture of the parent/caregiver and the professional community of
the school. There are only passing references to this issue in
the program. Powers et al. occasionally suggest that the
clinician "deliver" the program "in a culturally responsive
manner," that behavioral rewards be "designed in collaboration
with parents and the child," or that the program strategies be
"modified periodically in response to feedback from family
members and teachers about intervention acceptability."
Failure to deliberately adopt a position of cultural reciprocity
(Harry, Kalyanpur, & Day, 1999) and specifically address the
potential discontinuity between the program assumptions and those
of the culture and community of the parents/caregivers may lead
to ultimate failure of the project to promote any lasting
changes. For the seven weeks parents/caregivers participate in
program they are getting the support of a clinician who mediates
between them and the teacher/school. When the program ends and
they no longer have that support their actions, like those of
their children, may lead to future family and school homework
struggles.
The challenge to schools that implement the Homework Success
program is to develop ways to adapt the program elements and
tailor them to support specific families and parent-teacher
dynamics. The parent/caregiver group sessions provide structured
opportunities to offer information in a non-threatening
environment and a comfortable place to develop empowering skills
with school personnel. The danger exists that the strong
emphasis Homework Success places on treatment integrity,
reflecting the authors’ commitment to research, may serve as a
disincentive for clinicians to tailor the program to individual
families. The challenge to the clinician implementing Homework
Success is to discover how its behavioral approach can be
integrated with the cultural assumptions of the
parents/caregivers and the teachers participating in the program
and in the process lay the foundation for the development of
respectful collaborative relationships among parents/caregivers,
their children, and the teachers who teach them.
References
Dudley-Marling, C. (2000). A family affair: When school troubles
come home. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Edwards, P. (1999). A path to follow. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Harry, B., Kalyanpur, M., & Day, M. (1999). Building cultural
reciprocity with families: Case studies in special
education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publiching Co.
Pugach, M. C., & Johnson, L. J. (2002). Collaborative
practitioners, collaborative schools. Denver: Love
Publishing Company.
About the Reviewer
Kathleen Rutowski received her doctorate from Arizona State
University in 2001. She is
currently a lecturer in the College of Education at Arizona State
University and teaches courses in
special education. Her research interests focus on preservice
teacher education, the interface
between special education and general education, and disability
studies. Address all
correspondences to Kathleen Rutowski, Division of Curriculum and
Instruction, College of
Education, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-2011. Dr.
Rutowski can be reached via
e-mail at rutowski@asu.edu.
[ home |
overview | reviews | editors | submit | guidelines | announcements ]
| |