|
This review has been accessed times since October 22, 2004
Salmon, Gilly. (2004). E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and
Learning Online (2nd Edition). New York:
RoutledgeFalmer
xiv + 229 pages
$41 (Paper) ISBN 0-415-33544-2
Reviewed by Susan Crichton
University of Calgary
October 22, 2004
Many online educators will be familiar with Gilly
Salmon’s earlier work, E-tivities: The Key to Active
Online Learning, as well as the first edition of this text.
However, for those engaging in online practices for the first
time, E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning
Online is an essential read. For those of us who work
extensively in the field, this second edition is a great guide; a
reminder of the details of working online that one tends to
assume. Or forget, or overlook. E-moderating would also
be a valuable resource for administrators and program planners as
the text carefully describes the important issues of model
design, roles and responsibilities, training, and issues for the
future. Throughout, Salmon supports her comments with actual
transcripts from online conferences and courses.
The text is broken into two parts: (1) Concepts and Cases and
(2) Resources for Practitioners. Part One is a discussion of the
issues arising for educators moderating online conferences. Part
Two consists of fairly detailed lists of strategies and practices
within the areas of moderating skills, management skills,
exploration, and encouragement for participants.
In the preface, Salmon explains the developments that have
prompted this second edition. She notes that three key themes
have emerged since the first publication. First, there is less
of a need to convince people that online teachers, trainers, and
facilitators need support. She feels that people are now less
worried about technology doing away with teachers and more
concerned about how teachers need to be supported to use
technology well. Second, Salmon hopes that researchers have
“… stopped counting online messages, making spurious
comparisons between online and face to face, and started instead
to explore when and what we need to do to make online really
worthwhile” (p. xi). Third, there is the need to consider
how to “… scale up the e-moderating task force beyond
the early adopters …” (p. xi). Scalability is a
critical factor for many institutions, as the success of many
online programs is tied closely to ensuring a quality experience
for participants – teachers and students alike. These three
themes support the view that online learning is becoming more a
mainstream staple of educational programs and less a fad or
innovation.
Part One of this text offers one of the best explanations of
online teaching and learning. Salmon takes us back to the
initial use of the term online – from its roots in the
early days of the telegraph when people tapped not typed messages
directly on line rather than off line via the use of perforated
tape. She clearly presents the three dominant categories of
online technologies for education and training: informatics,
computer-assisted instruction, and computer mediated
conferencing, explaining the differences and similarities.
While noting the importance of the technology that supports
online learning, Salmon stresses the importance of the human
interaction and communication required to make the learning
experience successful. She also explains how online learning has
the potential to support the kinds of learning experiences that
allow for knowledge construction and constructivist forms of
engaging with content. Salmon is clearly among the group of
educators who sees that online learning has the potential to
support the new learning environments called for in the
literature (Jonassen, 2002; ISTE, 2003), but are not as pervasive
in actual practice.
As stated earlier, Salmon offers examples of discussion
postings and actual online interactions to support her points.
These examples are clearly differentiated from the text through
the use of shaded text boxes. This allows the reader to skip
them and follow the text in sequential manner if needed and
return to the examples at a later date. However, the examples
are well selected and illustrate the points well without
radically disrupting the flow of the arguments.
A good rationale is given for the use of the of an action
research model to collect the data for this text. Quoting Nunes
and McPherson (2002), Salmon states “Action research is
highly appropriate to the development of e-learning, where
experience suggests that significant modifications are required
to the traditional paradigm … changes imply not only
alterations to course models but also development of new
attitudes” (p. 17). This explanation is consistent with
the notion running through this text - online learning is not
simply scanning traditional lectures and placing them into Web CT
(or some other computer managed system), rather it is about
thinking hard about teaching and learning and allowing our best
practices and theories to support us in this rich and innovative
learning environment. Using a computer function as a metaphor,
online learning allows us to reset the teaching and
learning experience, and consider what could be rather than
transferring only what has been and currently is.
To assist with our conceptualization of the potential for
online learning, Salmon offers her five-stage model of teaching
and learning. The diagram (p. 29) illustrates the skills
required for e-moderating and technical support. The stages are
presented in a hierarchy from access and motivation through to
development. Intermediate stages include online socialization,
information exchange, and knowledge construction. The hierarchy
is based on the amount / degree of interactivity required to
accomplish learning. This model is well explained in Chapter 2,
drawing on relevant literature for support and clarification.
Examples from online conferences are given for each stage, and
Salmon explains the link from one stage to the next.
The diagram of the five stages is an important design
reference for those who are creating their own courses. It makes
explicit the need to recognize and honor the steps for good
teaching and learning by not creating tasks that assume
the participants can function effectively online and intuitively
move through the stages without intentional support and design
considerations from the course developer and moderator.
Chapter Three discusses the roles and skills required to be a
good online moderator. Salmon suggests that we consider them in
terms of qualities and competencies. She offers a table (p.
54-55) of competences noting that one should try to recruit
individuals with certain characteristics, recognizing that
training and development of those skills would be required. This
table of e-moderator competencies offers an excellent design or
professional development activities for online educators, and
program administrators wish to adopt it in their plans. It is
important to note that many people do not hold the competencies
and qualities suggested by Salmon. She states, “I tend to
select applicants who show empathy and flexibility in working
online, plus willingness to be trained as e-moderators. Before
asking them to work online, I train them in the competencies
described in columns 3-4 in [the table]. I would expect
e-moderators to be developing the skills in columns 5-6 by the
time they had been working online with their participants for
about one year” (p. 53). Seeing online teaching as a
learned, developed practice is critical as previous studies
(Crichton & Childs, 2004) suggest that many online educators
are simply thrown online and expected to sort out the new
environment along with their students. Salmon calls for training
and practice, noting that if we want online education to be
different from what currently exists, we must recognize the need
for thoughtfully training and development as well as an
understanding of content / course development.
Chapter Four elaborates on the training required for
e-moderators. Salmon states “Any significant initiative
aimed at changing teaching methods or the introduction of
technology into teaching and learning should include effective
e-moderator support and training, otherwise its outcomes are
likely to be meagre and unsuccessful” (p. 80). While we
should know this from years of unsuccessful, or moderately
successful, technology integration initiatives, this chapter is
an excellent reminder that simply assuming that innovations will
be infused meaningfully into existing practices is not usually
the case in education. Further, Salmon notes “E-moderating
is not a set of skills any of us is born with, nor one that we
have learnt vicariously through observing teachers while we
ourselves were learning” (p. 80-81). She ensures us to
recognize that there is something very different about teaching
and learning online; something that is not intuitive or obvious.
It requires an understanding of the media and the medium, as well
as the content and context. Throughout this chapter, and in the
text itself, I believe that Salmon is supporting the need for
sustained professional development for online educators as well
as considering a preservice program (Crichton & Childs,
2004). Salmon states “At present many of the most
enthusiastic and successful e-moderators are those ‘gypsy
scholars’ working in a portfolio way, and those who have
experienced and seen the benefits of leading and constructing
knowledge with virtual learning groups” (p. 81). This
observation is certainly consistent with my experience, and is
certainly not the way to address the need for qualified online
educators.
My only frustration with this text surfaces in Chapter Four.
Salmon separates e-moderating from the other aspects of online
teaching. She makes little or no mention of course development,
separating the task of moderating from the academic / content
skills required to develop and organize an online course. While
this separation is to be expected, especially with the title of
the text, I am not too certain how many online educators have
their roles so neatly divided. It appears that many K-12 online
educators have to assume all aspects of the work, and even if
they “inherit” a course that has been designed, they
are expected to modify it for their students. Also,
universities, such as my own, expect faculty to propose, design,
development, and deliver online courses. While they may be
offered support in the development of media objects, all other
aspects of the work are to be assumed by the instructor. I would
have been interested to know how many online educators function
solely as moderators as suggested in this text.
Chapter Five presents the experiences of the e-moderators and
the participants. It focuses on the different perspectives that
each brings to the online environment, noting how novice
moderators and participants different in their views from more
experienced individuals. Each has an expectation of what online
teaching and learning might be. For some, the expectations may
be based on prior experiences, for others simply the hype and/ or
promotion of individual programs or public media. Citing
Chisholm, Carey et al (2002), Salmon notes “The support and
actions of e-moderators, more than the functions of the
technology in use, can truly make the difference between
disappointment and highly productive learning. In a situation of
widening access and value in diversity in online learning,
ensuring inclusiveness has never been more important” (p.
104). This chapter addresses issues of access and participation,
learning styles and approaches, disabilities and online working,
corporate training, gender and e-moderating, lurking, and
induction. Again, Salmon offers rich examples from courses in
the UK and Australia. She explains in detail the major points of
each issue and offers tips as to how to address them. She also
connects the points raised to the specific suggestions within
Part Two of this text.
The final chapter, The Key to the Future, offers interesting
scenarios that present futuristic situations. These scenarios
encourage us to think beyond what currently exists. Salmon
reminds us that “A scenario is a descriptive forecast of a
landscape that an organization or institution might find itself
in. Scenarios are not about forecasting the future but about
looking at the possibilities – what we might think of as
‘strategic conversations’” (p. 137). Scenarios
allow us see things differently and “… avoid a simple
‘solutions’ approach and the risks of trivializing
potentially significant decisions” (p. 137). With this in
mind, Chapter Six offers even the most experienced online
educators an opportunity to think beyond their own online
practices and consider the future. The fact that technology will
continue to change is a given. The fact that online and learning
will probably expand is given. The question that this book so
strongly poses is will we change our practices and thinking
enough to consider the possibilities? Will we organize
intentional mentoring / training programs that will allow us to
scale the online model effectively?
E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online
is a valuable text. Educators and administrators currently
planning programs within their organizations should read this
book and incorporate its ideas into their professional
development options. Those currently teaching online might
appreciate a review of items in Part Two as a reminder of some of
the steps or strategies to encourage online interaction. For
those totally new to the field, Salmon offers a warm and honest
introduction to online learning; a welcome that many of us early
adopters would have welcomed!
References
Crichton, S. & Childs, E. (July / August 2004). Teachers
as Online Educators: Requirements for Distributed Learning and
Teacher Preparation. Educational Technology, 44(4),
25-30.
ISTE (2002). Standards for Technology-supported Learning
Environments
http://www.iste.org/news/2002/10/23-nasbe/nasbe-tech-supported-2002.pdf.
Jonassen, D.H. (2002). Engaging And Supporting Problem Solving
In Online Learning. Quarterly Review of Distance
Education, 3 (1), 1-13.
About the Reviewer
Susan Crichton
Assistant Professor
Educational Technology
Faculty of Education
University of Calgary
602 Ed Tower
2500 University Dr. NW
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada
(403) 220-7522 FAX (403) 282-7489
www.ucalgary.ca/~crichtos
~
ER home |
Reseņas Educativas |
Resenhas Educativas ~
~
overview | reviews | editors | submit | guidelines | announcements
~
| |