This review has been accessed
times since April 20, 2009
|
Tatto, Maria Teresa (Ed.) (2007). Reforming Teaching
Globally. Oxford, United Kingdom: Symposium Books
Pp. 280 ISBN 978-1-873927-75-5
|
Reviewed by Sarah A. Robert & Amanda S. Smith
University at Buffalo
April 20, 2009
Reforming Teaching Globally begins with the
promise of shedding light on how teaching is affected by the
movement of education policy discourses of restructuring,
accountability, achievement, and quality around the globe. In
ten national contexts, readers are introduced to the ways local
and global forces interact to affect teachers and
conceptualizations of their profession. “At this time of
vigorous change in education and particularly in teacher-related
policy,” Tatto argues that “international
comparisons are essential to explore how the multiplicity of
forces unleashed by ongoing global educational reforms are
currently affecting teachers and teaching” (p. 7). Indeed,
a strength of this compilation is the focus on one particular
policy discourse—accountability, in all ten chapters,
providing ample data to compare and contrast national-level
reform processes toward theorizing global education
reform’s impact on teaching.
Curricular standards, high-stakes testing, new teacher
credentials, institutional accreditation, and performance
incentives all are aimed at holding teachers responsible for
their students’ achievement. Accountability mechanisms may
not be new to education systems, but the number of them at
multiple levels of educational institutions and the demand for
change in a “crisis mode” is noteworthy. With the
demand for more accountability mechanisms arising in a context of
educational crisis, educational and political decision-makers
seek out reforms from nations whose students are performing
better on international assessments (e.g., TIMSS and PISA
exams). The urgency to address a crises mentality often means
that policies remain “general and acontextual” (p.
10), removed from local ideas about the purpose and function of
education. The chapters illustrate the impact decontextualized
accountability standards have on the epistemological foundations
of national education systems: What knowledge should be taught
in this so-called moment of globalization? Who is qualified to
teach this knowledge? How should the “ideal teacher”
(p. 15) be educated?
This compilation makes clear that accountability schemes merit
further scrutiny, particularly from national perspectives.
However the argument of the book (explicitly stated on page 15)
does not push aside the fact that intensive educational
restructuring takes place in a globalization era. Tatto situates
the national-level teacher reforms within a broader global
process of restructuring economic, political, and social
institutions. It is the last group of institutions into which
teacher education and teacher’s work is situated and thus
Tatto astutely pushes the reader to contemplate the multiple
meanings of “social” and how globalization forces
shape those meanings. How are globalization era reforms
affecting different societies’ definitions of “the
ideal person” and the “ideal teacher for the ideal
person” (author’s emphasis, p. 15)? The thesis
of the book, clearly stated near the beginning of the
introduction, is that decontextualized accountability measures
for teachers and teaching are “taking control of education
away from teachers and teacher educators . . . and eliminating
the very mechanisms that can help teachers to effectively
increase education quality” (p. 13).

Maria Teresa Tatto
|
The book would fit well within comparative and international
education courses, particularly courses focused on globalization
and education policy, or teacher education courses aimed at
understanding reform trends affecting teacher education and the
teaching profession worldwide. This edited collection has a
simple and straightforward format: a short introduction, ten
chapters, and a short conclusion. In eleven pages, Tatto
outlines an approach to understanding worldwide teacher reform as
part of a process of changing the philosophical ideals
undergirding national education projects. By focusing the reader
on one facet of reform, accountability measures, she suggests
that her compilation will show how changes to teaching look from
national and global perspectives. The book’s ten chapters
are divided equally between two parts. Part I of the book is
titled “Reform Emphasising Increased Control over
Teachers’ Work and Performance.” This section
introduces the reader to China, Germany, Bulgaria, Canada, and
then to the United States. Part II is titled “Reform
Emphasising Teachers’ Professional Knowledge and
Discretion.” In this section the reader travels to Mexico,
Chile, Japan, the Philippines, and Guinea. (Each chapter is
described below.) A brief conclusion, authored by Tatto and
David N. Plank, follows the ten chapters.
Our review continues with a brief introduction to the ten
national cases, presented in the order they are arranged in the
book. We provide subtitles to denote the division of the
chapters into the two book parts. A critical analysis of the
book’s ability to meet its intended goal is presented
afterward.
Reforms Emphasising Increased Control over Teachers’
Work and Performance
Dilemmas in Reforming China’s Teaching: Assuring
“Quality” in Professional
Development.
The thesis of this chapter resides in the struggle China faces
not only to reform education but to move teachers unwilling to
change their old way of behaving and thinking. Of these reforms,
China seeks to address the inequalities and lack of opportunity
many Chinese face. This chapter therefore, intends to explore the
challenges China faces in regards to building new accountability
systems to increase the professional development of teachers. Two
contrasting vignettes are presented to illustrate the diverse
contexts of teachers’ work. Due to it’s size, both in
population and land mass, it is difficult to unify
teachers’ work across China. These two vignettes speak from
the teachers’ perspectives regarding the effect of
educational reform. A clear illustration is drawn; despite the
countries attempt to unify the educational system, the workload
and obstacles teachers face is as varied as the country itself.
Depending on what part of the country a teacher works, the
experience of teaching and impact of reforms will be very
different.
The Impact of Global Tendencies on the German Teacher
Education System.
The current chapter canvases an illustration on the backdrop
in which Germany’s educational system leans.
Germany’s educational system has persevered, relatively
unchanged through many historical events, including both World
Wars. Although once considered a strength of Germany’s
educational system, their traditional ways have more recently
contributed to reservations to change. In the context of
Germany’s historical, political, and socio-economic
background, as discussed in the chapter, the country’s fear
to change is clear. From this perspective, the current chapter
focuses on educational transition that have proceeded (i.e.,
movement from state to university controlled teacher educational
programs, the European Union). Although a thorough analysis is
provided, the chapter lacks a personal account of the impact such
reforms has had on the lives and work of teachers in Germany
today.
The Influence of the World Educational Changes on the
Teacher Educational System in Bulgaria .
The thesis of the present chapters rests in the exploration of
the relative steadiness the Bulgarian educational system has
maintained despite both economic changes and decreased social
status of teachers. Once highly respectable individuals, the
status of Bulgarian teachers’ has diminished. The current
chapter seeks to give an explanation to these changes while also
discussing the substantial effects on teachers’ pay and
school resources. In order to illustrate the changes in the
educational system, the reader is given the opportunity to
explore a case study pertinent to mathematics teachers. This
analysis highlights the Bulgarian philosophy: teachers are to be
highly trained as “subject matter specialists” (p.
75), and as a result lack pedagogical training and the limited
ability to teach in other subject matters.
Ontario, Canada: The State Asserts Its Voice or
Accountability Supersedes Responsibility.
The current chapter seeks to explore reforms in education, and
specifically the effects on teachers’ lives and work in
Ontario. Due to its vast size, Ontario’s educational system
has historically been controlled locally and over time more
governmental control has been implemented. Thus the present
chapter dives into a discussion on how these changes have
engendered both purposeful changes (i.e., curriculum development,
teacher education) and vicarious changes (i.e., how the increase
in professional status of teachers has resulted in a higher level
of control over schools). The chapter closes with a discussion on
how “accountability regimes in Ontario schooling
contributed to or undermined the professional responsibilities of
teachers” (p. 112) and provides an excellent assessment of
the past and present status of the educational system in
Ontario.
The New Accountability and Teachers’ Work in Urban
High Schools in the USA.
The focus of the current chapter remains in the Chicago Public
Schools (CPS) regarding the systems of reforms created in order
to promote accountability in CPS schools. The chapter presents a
discussion on the development of these reforms, stemming in
response to the huge deficit CPS school boards faced and
subsequent cuts state legislation made. Funding and state aid was
thus decreased until CPS was able to increase student performance
on standardized testing. In order to speak to the experiences of
teachers in CPS schools, the author refers to a high school in
which he calls “Colson.” This illustration helps the
reader to understand how schools were shaped by the reforms,
responded to the accountability mandates, and how these policies
changed teachers’ work.
Reforms Emphasizing Teachers’ Professional Knowledge and
Discretion
Mexico’s Educational Reform and the Reshaping of
Accountability on Teachers’ Development and
Work .
The present chapter seeks to illustrate the impact of the
current decentralization reforms occurring throughout the Mexican
educational system. Although the Mexican government still
controls many of the administrative (i.e., school calendar,
textbooks), educational (i.e., syllabi, curricula), and teacher
training (i.e., programs, evaluative procedures) procedures,
movement towards local accountability policies exist. Since the
quality education received in Mexico is intertwined in the area
in which a child lives, the current chapter seeks to discuss the
discrepancies that exists impacting teachers; work and the
present Mexican educational system. As illustrated, a divergence
remains between these changes occurring in law and the
implantations of these practices by teachers in the
classroom.
Teachers and Accountability: The case of Chile.
.
The focus of the current chapter is the exploration of
measuring and gauging the quality of education in Chile through
the use of two “instruments”: a “system of
accreditation for undergraduate university programmes, and a
system of teacher performance evaluation” (p. 169). These
two mechanisms are thus discussed in terms of their ability to
increase the quality of education provided in Chile. The author
utilizes visualizations through charts and graphs throughout the
chapter to help assist the readers’ understanding of the
Chilean educational system, teacher standards, and evaluation.
The chapter ends with a discussion on what others can learn from
the Chilean educational system.
Teacher Accountability and Curriculum Reform in Japan: A
multi-level analysis of the "Rainbow Plan."
The present chapter provides both a historical perspective and
multi-level analysis of the adoption of the “Rainbow
Plan” in Japan. As a result of a decreasing population of
young adults, concern exists regarding the number of individuals
who will enter the work force. Therefore, critical to government
reforms is to decrease the pressure and stress many Japanese
children are placed under. Such change is taking place through
the adoption of the Rainbow Plan. Thus, the current chapter
details the goals and policies of the Rainbow Plan, as the
Japanese government seeks to move away from the emphasis on test
scores and entrance exams and towards a national curriculum that
includes “integrated studies” and mandates a shorter
school week (i.e., 5 days instead of 5 ½ days). These
reforms help to both cut school cost and also reduce the stress
and problem behaviors that have emerged in many of the Japanese
schools. Strategies, accountability, and implications regarding
changes to teachers’ work as a result of the rainbow plan
are discussed.
Teacher Education and Accountability Policies for Improving
Teaching Effectiveness in the Philippines.
The current chapter seeks to illustrate that despite the push
from legislation to make education the most important priority
for government spending, these efforts paid off in so far as
increasing enrollment rates and completion rates through school,
but do not increase low test scores. Thus, to this day the
Philippines continue to focus their attention on improving their
educational system. Reforms regarding accountability, teacher
quality, and competence have engendered policies to improve
education while also attempting to address “serious gaps
and inequities in the distribution of resources and
quality” of education that exist in the Philippines (p.
217). As true in many countries, the effects of these policies
are not always as in intended. The current chapter seeks to warn
the reader of these policies through the context of the
Philippian experience.
Accountability in the Context of Teacher Empowerment: The
Guinean experience.
The current chapter seeks to examine the reform system in
Guinea which has predominately focused on the reintegration of
French into the school system. Historically, reforms during the
socialist Cultural Revolution banned the use of French language,
only allowing the use of Guinean to be taught in school. However,
after the death of the Guinea leader, Sekou Toure, French has
returned to the schools. The reintegration, however, has not
happened easily as the French language had not been taught in 16
years. Thus, the current chapter focuses on the implementation of
policies that have required the restructuring of curriculum and
creation of language upgrading centers. Teachers’ education
has mainly focused on the requirement of enrollment in language
upgrading centers, and although resistant to this approach more
recent reforms have focused on policies regarding the
development, training, accountability, and professional practice
of teachers in Guinea.
Critical Analysis and Conclusions
As readers make their way through the chapters, the national
experiences begin to blend together or overlap into what may be a
global narrative of teacher reform. Taking away the different
names to the various education laws or reform efforts, national
boundaries become fuzzy suggesting a pattern of similar reform,
which reflects Tatto’s statements that many proposed
changes are not contextualized to the particular national
environment. However, differences do exist even when nations
elect the same measures to achieve change. Tatto and Plank
illustrate the “convergences and divergences in national
policy frameworks” in the final concluding section of the
same title. There the reader will find a clear visual and
narrative map of the similarities and differences across nations
(pp. 273-276), which is an important contribution toward
theorizing global teaching reform. Still, a global picture of
whether or how teaching is changing as a result of shifting
conceptualizations of the “ideal person” and the
“ideal teacher to teach the ideal person” does not
come into focus. How are globalization era reforms affecting
different societies’ definitions of “the ideal
person” and the “ideal teacher for the ideal
person” (author’s emphasis, p. 15)? The authors
do not articulate an answer to the question. Nor do the authors
use the knowledge found in the chapters to theorize how and why
global teaching reform reflects epistemological shifts toward or
away from a global imaginary of the “ideal
person.”
Why are the ten chapters divided and grouped under the Part I
and Part II titles? Though the answer to this question is
provided in a diagram on the final pages of the book, a brief
introduction to the sections would have pulled the reader along
toward understanding the bigger picture and the equally important
similarities and differences across nations. Despite the
introduction, conclusion, and the book title encouraging the
reader to see the global connections between the national
investigations, the compilation reads as many
books-in-the-making.
In fact, the chapters that remain vivid and differentiated in
our minds after reading the compilation are those that dive below
the national reform discourse surface to provide a view of
education policy from teachers’ perspectives. So much
print has been dedicated to tracing out policy discourse,
disconnected from the person’s who must interpret and
practice the reform in a nation’s classroom. The
selections that utilize teachers’ interpretation and
practice of reforms—often to compare and contrast
intra-national reform processes—contribute important
insight on the reform of teachers’ work at the beginning of
the twenty-first century and do illustrate who is teaching and
how they are trained to educate in a global era. These
insights yield vital knowledge of the ways reforms are
transformed on the ground into local epistemological
understandings of the purpose and aim of
education.
In a moment when the publishing complex frowns upon single
case studies, particularly outside the United States
“case,” the editor (and series editor) should be
commended for providing the educational community with in-depth
views of national education reforms outside (though including)
the United States. The presentation of single-nation cases
reveals the importance of national context in shaping education
reform discourses into distinct processes of educational change.
The compilation provides powerful examples that speak to the
continued importance of historical, socio-cultural, political,
and economic contexts in shaping teachers’ work, attempts
to reform that work, and education, more generally, all the while
legitimating global forces part in shaping national reform
processes.
Nevertheless, the book is titled such that the reader will
pick it up to learn about global trends affecting teaching. The
authors collectively share a wealth of knowledge on the topic.
The vital work of theorizing the movement, transformation, and
differentiation of global teaching reform discourse and text into
localities has been left for others to complete. What would that
last, desired chapter reveal; or, how does location, such as
China, Germany, Bulgaria, Canada, United States, Mexico, Chile,
Japan, Philippines, and Guinea, shape global teaching reform
discourses and texts? How, in turn, does that transform notions
of the ideal person and the ideal teacher for that person on
global and local levels?
About the Book Author
Maria Teresa Tatto is an associate professor at the College of
Education in Michigan State University. Her research is
characterized by the use of an international-comparative
framework to study educational reform and educational policy and
their impact on schooling--particularly the role of teachers,
teaching, and learning - within varied organizational, economic,
political, and social contexts. Tatto is currently the director
and principal investigator for the Teacher Education and
Development Study in Mathematics or TEDS-M. This is the first
comparative large-scale study to examine the institutions,
processes and outcomes of teacher preparation and induction in
close to twenty countries. This groundbreaking comparative study
with a seven-year span (2002-2009) includes countries in Latin
America, North America, Europe, Eurasia (Russia), Asia, the
Middle East and Africa. The study is sponsored by the IEA and is
funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation and the
participating countries.
About the Reviewers
Sarah A. Robert is assistant professor at the University at
Buffalo’s Graduate School of Education. Her research
interests include theorizing social equity in relation to
educational labor and education reform in North and South
America.
Amanda S. Smith is a doctoral student at the University at
Buffalo in the Graduate School of Education. Her research
interests include the study of children and adolescents and in
particular their emotional regulation and coping strategies in
relation to internalizing disorders (i.e., eating disorders).
Copyright is retained by the first or sole author,
who grants right of first publication to the Education Review.
Editors: Gene V Glass, Gustavo Fischman, Melissa Cast-Brede
~
ER home |
Reseņas Educativas |
Resenhas Educativas ~
~
overview | reviews | editors | submit | guidelines | announcements | search
~