Passing the baton to the second Acquired Wisdom editorial team
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14507/er.v25.2415Abstract
The series, Acquired Wisdom. Lessons Learned by Distinguished Researchers (AW) has attracted a good deal of notice. As we, the founding AW editors, pass the baton to a new editing team we have prepared these notes to summarize the history of the series, our decisions regarding its release, some of what we have learned from editing this series, and our hopes for its future.
References
Atkinson, R. C. (1968). Computer based instruction in initial learning. In Proceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Carroll, J. B. (1974). Fitting a model of school learning to aptitude and achievement data over grade levels. In D. R. Green (Ed.), The aptitude-achievement distinction. Monterey, CA: McGraw-Hill.
Carroll, J. B. (1977). A revisionist model of school learning. Review of Education, 3, 155-167.
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles, C. M. (2003). The "Why's" of class size: Student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research, 73, 321-368.
Fletcher, J. D., & Morrison, J. E. (2014). Accelerating development of expertise: A digital tutor for Navy technical training (D-5358). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
Gettinger, M., & White, M. A. (1980). Evaluating curriculum fit with class ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 338-344.
Glaser, R. (1968). Adapting the elementary school curriculum to individual performance. In Proceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Kulik, J. A, & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: a meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86, 42–78.
Roe, A. (1953). A psychological study of eminent psychologists and anthropologists, and a comparison with biological and physical scientists. Psychological Monographs, 67(2), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093638
Sternberg, R., & Hedlund, J. (2002). Practical intelligence, g, and work psychology. Human Performance, 15, 143–60.
Suppes, P. (1964) Modern learning theory and the elementary-school curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 1, 79-93.
Suppes, P., Fletcher, J. D., & Zanotti, M. (1975). Performance models of American Indian students on computer-assisted instruction in elementary mathematics. Instructional Science, 4, 303-313.
Thorndike, E. L. (1906). Principles of teaching. New York, NY: A. G. Seiler & Company.
Tobias, S. (1989). Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to student characteristics. Educational Psychologist, 24, 213-227.
Tobias, S. (2016, April 13). No Panacea Garden. In S. Tobias, J. D. Fletcher, and D. C. Berliner (Series Eds.), Acquired Wisdom Series, Vol 1. Education Review, 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/er.v23.2060
Tobias, S., & Fletcher, J. D. (Eds.) (2000). Training and retraining: A handbook for business, industry, government, and the military. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Vanlehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Education Review/Reseñas Educativas/Resenhas Educativas is supported by the Scholarly Communications Group at the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University. Copyright is retained by the first or sole author, who grants right of first publication to the Education Review. Readers are free to copy, display, distribute, and adapt this article, as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and Education Review, the changes are identified, and the same license applies to the derivative work. More details of this Creative Commons license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
All Education Review/Reseñas Educativas/Resenhas Educativas content from 1998-2020 and was published under an earlier Creative Commons license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0
Education Review is a signatory to the Budapest Open Access Initiative.