Review of Digital divisions: How schools create inequality in the tech era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14507/er.v29.3333References
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education. Oxford University Press.
Bower, M. (2017). Design of technology-enhanced learning. Emerald Publishing.
Carr, W. (1998). The curriculum in and for a democratic society. Curriculum Studies, 6(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369800200044
Foer, F. (2017). World without mind: The existential threat of big tech. Penguin Books.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2021a). ISTE standards for students. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2021b). Student-centered learning. https://www.iste.org/standards/essential-conditions/student-centered-learning
Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning. BookBaby. https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=5861726
Ito, M., Horst, H. A., Bittanti, M., Herr, S. B., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J., & Robinson, L. (2009). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. The MIT Press.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Molnar, A., & Boninger, F. (2020). The commercial transformation of America’s schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720963223
Murphy, A., Haverstock, E., Gara, A., Helman, C., & Vardi, N. (2021, May 13). The Global 2000 2021. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/lists/global2000/
Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology: Educational technology and determinism. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers’ espoused and enacted practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003636737
Rafalow, M. H. (2018). Disciplining play: Digital youth culture as aapital at school. American Journal of Sociology, 123(5), 1416–1452.
Shifflet, R., & Weilbacher, G. (2015). Teacher beliefs and their influence on technology use: A case study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 368–394.
Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M. (2020). Post-Covid-19 education and education technology ‘solutionism’: A seller’s market. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 863–878. https://doi.org/3–878 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x
The White House. (2021, March 31). Fact sheet: The American jobs plan. [Press Release]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan update (Version 2.0).
Wacquant, L. J. D. (1989). Towards a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.2307/202061
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Education Review/Reseñas Educativas/Resenhas Educativas is supported by the Scholarly Communications Group at the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University. Copyright is retained by the first or sole author, who grants right of first publication to the Education Review. Readers are free to copy, display, distribute, and adapt this article, as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and Education Review, the changes are identified, and the same license applies to the derivative work. More details of this Creative Commons license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
All Education Review/Reseñas Educativas/Resenhas Educativas content from 1998-2020 and was published under an earlier Creative Commons license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0
Education Review is a signatory to the Budapest Open Access Initiative.