Essay Review of The Public School Advantage: Why Public Schools Outperform Private Schools

Amanda U. Potterton

Full Text:

PDF
Cover Image

References


Arizona Department of Education. (2014). Empowerment scholarship. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/esa/

Belfield, C., & Levin, H. M. (2005). Vouchers and public policy: When ideology trumps evidence. American Journal of Education, 111(4), 548-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/431183

Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, Company, Inc.

Berliner, D. C., & Glass, G. V (2014). 50 myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

Braun, H., Jenkins, F., & Grigg, W. (2006). Comparing private schools and public school using hierarchical linear modelling (NCES, 2006-461). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Center for Education Reform. (2014). The last eight states without charter school laws. Retrieved from http://www.edreform.com/2013/01/the-last-eight-states-without-charter-school-laws/

Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). America’s public schools: Choice is a panacea. The Brookings Review, 8(3), 4-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20080159

Cobb, C. D., & Glass G. V (1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v7n1.1999

Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.

Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools. Sociology of Education, 55(2), 65-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112288

DiMartino, C., & Scott, J. (2013). Private sector contracting and democratic accountability. Educational Policy, 27(2), 307-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904812465117

Ertas, N., & Roch, C. H. (2014). Charter schools, equity, and student enrollments: The role of for-profit educational management organizations. Education and Urban Society, 46(5), 548-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124512458118

Forster, G. (2005, May 12). “F” is for failure. National Review Online. Retrieved from http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/214425/f-failure/greg-forster

Frankenberg, E., Siegel-Hawley, G., & Wang, J. (2011). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 19(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v19n1.2011

Ginsburg, M. B., & Gorostiaga, J. M. (2001). Relationships between theorists/researchers and policy makers/practitioners: Rethinking the two-cultures thesis and the possibility of dialogue. Comparative Education Review, 45(2), 173-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/447660

Greene, J. P. (2014, March 26). Wolf takes on the big Lubienskis. Retrieved from http://jaypgreene.com/2014/03/26/wolf-takes-on-the-big-lubienskis/

Grogger, J., & Neal, D. A. (2000). Further evidence on the effects of Catholic secondary schooling. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2000, 1, 151-193. Brookings Institution Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/urb.2000.0006

Holme, J. J., & Richards, M. P. (2009). School choice and stratification in a regional context: Examining the role of inter-district choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 150-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01619560902810120

Hoxby, C., Murarka, S., & Kang, J. (2009). How New York City’s charter schools affect achievement. Second report in series. Cambridge, MA: New York City Charter Schools Evaluation Project. Retrieved from http://users.nber.org/~schools/charterschoolseval/how_NYC_charter_schools_affect_achievement_sept2009.pdf

Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2005). A new look at public and private schools: Student background and mathematics achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(9), 696-699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003172170508600914

Lubienski, C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2006). Charter, private, public schools and academic achievement: New evidence from the NAEP mathematics data. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.

Lubienski, S. T. (2006). Examining instruction, achievement, and equity with NAEP mathematics data. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 14(14). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v14n14.2006

Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006a). School sector and academic achievement: A multilevel analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 651-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312043004651

Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006b). What NAEP can tell us about school achievement. Education Week, 25(26), 28-30. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2006/03/08/26lubienski.h25.html

Lubienski, S. T., Lubienski, C., & Crane, C. C. (2008). Achievement differences and school type: The role of school climate, teacher certification, and instruction. American Journal of Education, 115(1), 97-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/590677

Lubienski, C. A., & Lubienski, S. T. (2014). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226089072.001.0001

Lubienski, C. (2014, April 2). The ongoing debate on public and private school effectiveness: Vouchers, representative samples, fundamentalism, and Wal-Mart. The Forum on the Future of Public Education. Retrieved from http://forum.illinois.edu/blog/109

Miron, G., & Nelson, C. (2002). What’s public about charter schools? Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Ni, Y. (2009). The impact of charter schools on the efficiency of traditional public schools: Evidence from Michigan. Economics of Education Review, 28(5), 571-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.01.003

Peterson, P., & Laudet, E. (2006). On the public-private school achievement debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Stossel, J. (2006, July 26). Smearing education choice. Townhall.com. Retrieved from http://townhall.com/columnists/johnstossel/2006/07/26/smearing_education_choice/page/full

U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2014a). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/

U.S. Department of Education. (2014b). Race to the Top fund. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf

Wenglinsky, H. (2006). On ideology, causal inference and the reification of statistical methods: Reflections on “Examining instruction, achievement and equity with NAEP mathematics data.” Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(17). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v14n17.2006

Wenglinsky, H. (2007). Are private high schools better academically than public high schools? Washington DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=121

Wolf, P. J. (2010). School vouchers in Washington, DC: Achievement impacts and their implications for social justice. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(2), 131-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2010.484974

Wolf, P. J. (2014). Comparing public schools to private. Education Next, 14(3).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/er.v22.1875

Education Review

A multilingual journal of book reviews

ISSN: 1094-5296