Essay Review of The Public School Advantage: Why Public Schools Outperform Private Schools

Amanda U. Potterton

Full Text:

Cover Image


Arizona Department of Education. (2014). Empowerment scholarship. Retrieved from

Belfield, C., & Levin, H. M. (2005). Vouchers and public policy: When ideology trumps evidence. American Journal of Education, 111(4), 548-567.

Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, Company, Inc.

Berliner, D. C., & Glass, G. V (2014). 50 myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

Braun, H., Jenkins, F., & Grigg, W. (2006). Comparing private schools and public school using hierarchical linear modelling (NCES, 2006-461). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Center for Education Reform. (2014). The last eight states without charter school laws. Retrieved from

Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). America’s public schools: Choice is a panacea. The Brookings Review, 8(3), 4-12.

Cobb, C. D., & Glass G. V (1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(1).

Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.

Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools. Sociology of Education, 55(2), 65-76.

DiMartino, C., & Scott, J. (2013). Private sector contracting and democratic accountability. Educational Policy, 27(2), 307-333.

Ertas, N., & Roch, C. H. (2014). Charter schools, equity, and student enrollments: The role of for-profit educational management organizations. Education and Urban Society, 46(5), 548-579.

Forster, G. (2005, May 12). “F” is for failure. National Review Online. Retrieved from

Frankenberg, E., Siegel-Hawley, G., & Wang, J. (2011). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 19(1).

Ginsburg, M. B., & Gorostiaga, J. M. (2001). Relationships between theorists/researchers and policy makers/practitioners: Rethinking the two-cultures thesis and the possibility of dialogue. Comparative Education Review, 45(2), 173-196.

Greene, J. P. (2014, March 26). Wolf takes on the big Lubienskis. Retrieved from

Grogger, J., & Neal, D. A. (2000). Further evidence on the effects of Catholic secondary schooling. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2000, 1, 151-193. Brookings Institution Press.

Holme, J. J., & Richards, M. P. (2009). School choice and stratification in a regional context: Examining the role of inter-district choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 150-171.

Hoxby, C., Murarka, S., & Kang, J. (2009). How New York City’s charter schools affect achievement. Second report in series. Cambridge, MA: New York City Charter Schools Evaluation Project. Retrieved from

Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2005). A new look at public and private schools: Student background and mathematics achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(9), 696-699.

Lubienski, C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2006). Charter, private, public schools and academic achievement: New evidence from the NAEP mathematics data. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.

Lubienski, S. T. (2006). Examining instruction, achievement, and equity with NAEP mathematics data. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 14(14).

Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006a). School sector and academic achievement: A multilevel analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 651-698.

Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006b). What NAEP can tell us about school achievement. Education Week, 25(26), 28-30. Retrieved from

Lubienski, S. T., Lubienski, C., & Crane, C. C. (2008). Achievement differences and school type: The role of school climate, teacher certification, and instruction. American Journal of Education, 115(1), 97-138.

Lubienski, C. A., & Lubienski, S. T. (2014). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lubienski, C. (2014, April 2). The ongoing debate on public and private school effectiveness: Vouchers, representative samples, fundamentalism, and Wal-Mart. The Forum on the Future of Public Education. Retrieved from

Miron, G., & Nelson, C. (2002). What’s public about charter schools? Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Ni, Y. (2009). The impact of charter schools on the efficiency of traditional public schools: Evidence from Michigan. Economics of Education Review, 28(5), 571-584.

Peterson, P., & Laudet, E. (2006). On the public-private school achievement debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Stossel, J. (2006, July 26). Smearing education choice. Retrieved from

U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2014a). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Retrieved from

U.S. Department of Education. (2014b). Race to the Top fund. Retrieved from

Wenglinsky, H. (2006). On ideology, causal inference and the reification of statistical methods: Reflections on “Examining instruction, achievement and equity with NAEP mathematics data.” Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(17).

Wenglinsky, H. (2007). Are private high schools better academically than public high schools? Washington DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from

Wolf, P. J. (2010). School vouchers in Washington, DC: Achievement impacts and their implications for social justice. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(2), 131-150.

Wolf, P. J. (2014). Comparing public schools to private. Education Next, 14(3).


Education Review

A multilingual journal of book reviews

ISSN: 1094-5296