Review of Dialogic Feedback in the Age of Algorithmic Governance: Key to PCP-Coaching and Assessment-as-Learning, by Filip Dochy et al.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14507/er.v33.4635Resumen
Dialogic Feedback for High Impact Learning reframes feedback as a relational and dialogic process grounded in Assessment-as-Learning, offering a persuasive challenge to compliance-driven, transmission-based models of evaluation. This review examines the book's central contributions—dialogic feedback as relational practice, feedback literacy, and learner agency—alongside its limitations, including an underspecified audience and limited engagement with the sociotechnical conditions reshaping contemporary feedback systems. The review extends the dialogic framework into the domain of algorithmic governance, arguing that the three conditions Dochy and colleagues identify as essential to meaningful feedback—interpretive openness, relational accountability, and shared authority—are precisely those that AI-mediated evaluation systems tend to suppress. The book's most consequential contribution may be one it does not develop directly: it supplies the normative vocabulary needed to evaluate and challenge automated feedback infrastructures. Whether dialogic feedback can survive the turn toward automation is ultimately a question about power.
Citas
Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2016). The ethics of invention: Technology and the human future. W. W. Norton.
Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
[Book reviewed] Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Arikan, S. (2022). Dialogic feedback for high impact learning: Key to PCP-coaching and assessment-as-learning. Routledge.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Pamela Capulong

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los/as lectores/as pueden copiar, mostrar, distribuir, y adaptar este articulo, siempre y cuando se de crédito y atribución al autor/es y a Education Review/Reseñas Educativas/Resenhas Educativas , los cambios se identifican y la misma licencia se aplica al trabajo derivada. Más detalles de la licencia de Creative Commons se encuentran en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/. Education Review/Reseñas Educativas/Resenhas Educativas é publicada por Mary Lou Fulton Institute Teachers College da Arizona State University.
Todo conteúdo Education Review / Reseñas Educativas / Resenhas Educativas de 1998-2020 tem uma licença Creative Commons anterior: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0


